January 2025
How Effective are Water Quality Assurance Funds in Tanzania?
In rural Africa, an estimated two-thirds or more of the population is exposed to contaminated drinking water (UNICEF/WHO 2022). Monitoring water quality is essential to providing safe water and protecting public health, yet many rural water suppliers fail to conduct water quality tests regularly. Using an existing centralized laboratory for analysis may be a cost-effective option for expanding testing for many rural water suppliers. Still, these laboratories may be unwilling to work with rural suppliers due to non-payment risks. The Water Quality Assurance Fund is an innovative program with a financial mechanism developed to address these issues and encourage water quality monitoring in rural areas of Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania, and similar countries.
The Water Quality Assurance Fund allows existing professional laboratories to expand regular water quality testing to small rural water suppliers without taking on additional financial risks that would otherwise deter them from working with these systems. It relies upon a third-party nongovernmental organization (NGO) to guarantee payment to the laboratory if a rural water system is unable to pay for water testing services on time. The program can withdraw water systems if they default on payments multiple times. Additionally, the Assurance Fund can channel subsidies for water testing when needed.
The Assurance Fund implementation model includes capacity-building and engagement components to increase knowledge related to test results: (1) monthly meetings to discuss test results, (2) technical assistance to improve water treatment and chlorination at the request of water operators or local government authorities, (3) community engagement activities, and (4) online dashboards for visualizing water quality test data to foster accountability and competition among participating water systems.
Evaluating the Assurance Fund in Tanzania involves a lean assessment of the program in the five community-based water supply organizations (CBWSOs) enrolled. This report, developed by USAID REAL-Water, summarizes baseline data collected before the launch of the one-and-a-half-year Assurance Fund implementation model and comprises the first step of its impact evaluation.

The Gantt chart outlines the timeline for a two-year evaluation process spanning from May 2024 to April 2026. The Baseline phase begins in May 2024 and continues through July 2024, with implementation activities, including a launch event, community sensitization, and first monthly testing, starting in July. Midline I is scheduled for February 2025, marked by a data collection exercise represented by a magnifying glass icon. Midline II occurs in August 2025, also featuring a data collection period. The Endline phase is set for February 2026, concluding the evaluation with a final round of data collection. The timeline clearly separates each evaluation phase across the years with specific months highlighted for key activities.
The baseline results identified several areas of improvement in water safety management that the Water Quality Assurance Fund program may address:
- Water Treatment: All water samples had chlorine concentrations below the recommended level of at least 0.2 mg/L of free chlorine residual, which is inadequate to prevent recontamination during transport and storage. Microbial water quality was frequently poor at the collection point, with 75 percent of standpipe samples containing detectable E. coli in 100 ml water samples. These findings suggest that providing water operators with monthly water quality test results and technical guidance on corrective actions could encourage them to enhance their water treatment practices. We hypothesize that these activities will lead to increased chlorine residual levels and a reduction in E. coli presence at standpipes.
- Water Quality Knowledge: Water system operators had some knowledge of contamination sources and factors that ensure water safety, such as chlorination. However, their understanding of different types of contaminants and regulations or standards related to water quality was limited. These findings suggest that monthly water quality testing and debriefing meetings could enhance the knowledge of water system operators and decision-makers. We hypothesize that a better understanding could improve water treatment, system management, and source protection practices.
- Communication and Consumer Perceptions: Water providers rarely share water quality information with communities. Increased community engagement activities could enhance members’ awareness of water quality testing, treatment procedures, and safety standards. We hypothesize that water systems could improve consumer satisfaction with sufficient engagement in water safety management.
The implementation of the Assurance Fund in Tanzania began in August 2024 and is ongoing. As part of a process evaluation, we are concurrently tracking implementation activities, water system payments, and any unexpected outcomes. Data collection on impact indicators will occur every six months through early 2026.
DISCLAIMER: This report is made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this brief are the sole responsibility of The Aquaya Institute and REAL-Water consortium members. They do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.


